angelina jolie frenzy has been in full swing these last few weeks in bosnia thanks to tuesday’s premiere of her directorial debut, ‘in the land of blood and honey’, which she also wrote the screen play for.
the film is set in bosnia, using actors from the balkans, and was shot in both english and in the local language. the plot, loosely speaking, is about a bosniak woman and a serbian man, whose love is blown apart (literally!) at the beginning of the bosnian war. they then meet again when she is held captive at one of the notorious rape houses that existed between 1992 and 1995, and he winds up being her captor.
the conflict that happened in the balkans between 1992 and 1995 was the result of the dissolution of the former yugoslavia. bosnia and herzegovina (BiH) followed slovenia and croatia in declaring their independence, which became the last straw for the serbia, who invaded BiH. that is the simplified (in the extreme) version of what happened; other factors including historical myth, economics, racial and religious tensions all were factors in the conflict. BiH, because of its mixed ethnic and religious make up, found itself at the heart of the conflict. the siege of Sarajevo, the mass graves and genocide at srebrenica, the rape camps where girls as young as 12 were raped alongside generations of their female relatives..... these things happened in bosnia, and unsurprisingly, BiH remains divided, both between the two entities (republika srpska and the federation) and in people’s memories of the war.
the film has received mixed reviews in this country. on one hand, jolie has been praised for shedding light on the mass rape of women, so often forgotten by the west, and for attempting to present a somewhat balanced view of what happened here. at the premiere of the film in sarajevo, she received a standing ovation and spoke of her love and respect for the bosnian people. to many people here, she can do no wrong.
at the other end of the spectrum, the film is currently not being shown in r.s, the serb dominated region of BiH, because they believe the film promotes a biased portrayal of the serbian people. actors have received death threats and have had their car windows smashed in. jolie has also been criticized by some female victim groups for her ‘love story’ of a rapist and his victim (there is a wonderful article on the topic, written by the excellent valerie hopkins).
despite the controversy, i would recommend to all to see this film. why? for all its flaws (don’t expect shindler’s list here people) and its hollywoodization of the events (it was shot in hungary, and it’s, um, obvious), it shows a part of this war that is often forgotten. the systematic abuse of women during the bosnian conflict was widespread, yet still remains taboo and has an extremely low conviction rate here. anything that gets people talking and understanding these horrors is positive in my eyes. of course it’s a hollywood movie, and things aren’t always black and white here, but the mass rape of women IS a black and white subject, and in my eyes, deserves attention.
[jessica dowling]

